But why can corporations get away with this? In all honesty I believe it's because of the hazy definitions of these words. Or at the very least companies can make an argument that their products fall into these "artisan" and "craft" categories because of their new unusual flavors or extra ingredients not added to past products.
flickr image by Mike |
Small
Annual production of 6 million barrels of beer or less (approximately 3 percent of U.S. annual sales). Beer production is attributed to the rules of alternating proprietorship.
Independent
Less than 25 percent of the craft brewery is owned or controlled (or equivalent economic interest) by an alcoholic beverage industry member that is not itself a craft brewer.
Traditional
A brewer that has a majority of its total beverage alcohol volume in beers whose flavor derives from traditional or innovative brewing ingredients and their fermentation. Flavored malt beverages (FMBs) are not considered beers.
But are these requirements really necessary to be a craft brew, or have we deviated from the traditional meaning of the word craft? The word craft is of Germanic origin and means "an activity involving skill in making things by hand", among other definitions. How do we judge how much skill is necessary during the beer making process to brand the beer as craft? No one can really say because it's so subjective. But I'd say the entire beer making process takes skill and knowledge. I wouldn't be able to read a book about the brewing process go home that night and make a good batch of beer.
Certain advertised craft beers such as Blue Moon and Shock Top are not actually craft as defined by the Brewers Association because their parent companies, MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch respectively, are too large to fulfill the small size requirement. But the size of the company doesn't detract from the quality their beer. Tom Long, the CEO of MillerCoors, stated in an opinion piece to CNN "We respect the fact that some of our fellow brewers would want to differentiate themselves, but we're convinced that the ultimate assessment of our beers will not come from an industry organization, but instead from America's beer drinkers." I agree and believe that the size of the company shouldn't dictate if a beer is craft.
So what about being independent? Every beer is produced to have a specific quality to it whether it's a light beer, dark beer, ale, porter or IPA. The process of brewing is a craft in and of itself, so I believe that anyone who brews regardless of being independent can produce craft beers. So with all these requirements thrown out the window and by the definition of craft every beer is technically a craft beer. But what makes certain beers more special? PERCEPTION. "Craft beer" is a perception held in the mind of consumers and nothing more.
Consumers who care will look beyond the word and seek out real craft. In beer, and in everything else. Not everyone cares enough to, but those people probably weren't part of the craft beer market to begin with.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Joshua. I myself believe there is a distinction between craft beer and generic beer despite my counter argument the semantics of the word. I think the distinction should be made by the quality of the beer, the ingredients used, and size of individual beer batches (not necessarily company size nor style of beer.)
DeleteIts sad that corporations just jump on any and every bandwagon trend that small business have a slight advantage in.
ReplyDeleteIt is sad, and it gets even worse when big corporations buy up small businesses to penetrate these rising trend markets
Delete